Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Res Toxicol. 2007 Oct 2;20(11):1658–1664. doi: 10.1021/tx700131e

Table 1.

Mutational specificity of AAF, AF, and AP adducts in CCATCGCTACC sequence in simian kidney (COS-7) cellsa

Construct Total colonies screened G*→ G C A T Total targeted mutations Semi-targeted mutations
CGC 698 695 (99.6)b 0 0 0 0 (0) 3c (0.4)
CGAPC 660 639 (96.8) 3 (0.4) 4 (0.6) 9 (1.3) 16 (2.4) 5d (0.7)
CGAFC 740 730 (98.6) 2 (0.3) 0 6 (0.8) 8 (1.1) 2e (0.3)
CGAAFC 590 572 (96.9) 2 (0.3) 4f (0.3) 6 (1.0) 12 (2.0) 6g (1.0)
a

Data from several transformations have been combined.

b

The number in parenthesis shows the frequency in %.

c

A T→G two bases 5′, an A→C three bases 3′, and a C→T five bases 3′ to G; i.e., CCATCGCTACC was changed to CCAGCGCTACC, CCATCGCTCCC, and CCATCGCTACT.

d

A C→A four bases 5′, a T→G two bases 5′, two C→T one base 5′, and an A→C three bases 3′ to GAP; i.e., CCATCGAPCTACC was changed to CAATCGCTACC, CCAGCGCTACC, CCATTGCTACC, and CCATCGCTCCC.

e

A C→T and a C→A one base 5′ to GAF; i.e., CCATCGAFCTACC was changed to CCATTGCTACC and CCATAGCTACC.

f

Two of these included CGAAF→TA double mutations.

g

Six A deletions three bases 3′ to GAAF; i.e., CCATCGAAFCTACC was changed to CCATCGCT_CC.