Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Res Toxicol. 2007 Oct 2;20(11):1658–1664. doi: 10.1021/tx700131e

Table 2.

Mutational specificity of C8-AP-dG in CGCGCG sequence in simian kidney (COS-7) cells

Expt. # Construct Total colonies screened G*→ G C A T Total targeted mutations Semi-targeted mutations
1 CGC 168 168 (100)a 0 0 0 0 (0) 0
2 CGC 119 118 (99.2) 0 0 0 0 (0) 1b (0.8)
Total CGC 287 286 0 0 0 0 (0) 1 (0.4)
1 CGAPC 139 128 (92.1) 1 (0.7) 2 (1.4) 8 (5.8) 11 (7.9) 0
2 CGAPC 161 145 (90.1) 2 (1.2) 2 (1.2) 10c (6.2) 14 (8.7) 2d (1.2)
Total CGAPC 300 273 (91.0) 3 (1.0) 4 (1.3) 18 (6.0) 25 (8.3) 2 (0.7)
a

The number in parenthesis shows the frequency in %.

b

G deletion at the 3′ ligation site; i.e., CGCGCG was changed to CGCGC_.

c

Two of these GAP→T transversions also accompanied an adjacent 3′C deletion; i.e., CGCGAPCG was changed to CGCT_G.

d

One 5′ C→A adjacent to the adducted G and one +A 5′ to the adducted G; i.e., CGCGAPCG was changed to CGAGCG and CGCaGCG (where the inserted base was shown as an underlined lower case base).