Table 2.
Expt. # | Construct | Total colonies screened | G*→ G | C | A | T | Total targeted mutations | Semi-targeted mutations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CGC | 168 | 168 (100)a | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 |
2 | CGC | 119 | 118 (99.2) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) | 1b (0.8) |
Total | CGC | 287 | 286 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) | 1 (0.4) |
1 | CGAPC | 139 | 128 (92.1) | 1 (0.7) | 2 (1.4) | 8 (5.8) | 11 (7.9) | 0 |
2 | CGAPC | 161 | 145 (90.1) | 2 (1.2) | 2 (1.2) | 10c (6.2) | 14 (8.7) | 2d (1.2) |
Total | CGAPC | 300 | 273 (91.0) | 3 (1.0) | 4 (1.3) | 18 (6.0) | 25 (8.3) | 2 (0.7) |
The number in parenthesis shows the frequency in %.
G deletion at the 3′ ligation site; i.e., CGCGCG was changed to CGCGC_.
Two of these GAP→T transversions also accompanied an adjacent 3′C deletion; i.e., CGCGAPCG was changed to CGCT_G.
One 5′ C→A adjacent to the adducted G and one +A 5′ to the adducted G; i.e., CGCGAPCG was changed to CGAGCG and CGCaGCG (where the inserted base was shown as an underlined lower case base).