Table 5.

Seemingly Unrelated Regressions of Union Satisfaction on Religious Attendance and Adherence to Values.

	Men		Women		Men b = Women b
Religious Service Attendance	b	SE b	b	SE b
Father attends frequently	.21*	.08	−.02	.09	*
Mother attends frequently	−.00	.07	−.05	.07	n.s.
Both attend frequently	.13*	.06	.13	.07	n.s.
Neither attends	---	---	---	---	---
Spousal Religious Denomination
Black Protestant	.14	.09	.07	.09	---
Catholic	.02	.09	−.11	.10	---
Conservative Protestant	.−01	.10	−.05	.10	---
Other	−.12	.10	.24*	.10	---
None	---	---	---	---	---
Spouses same denomination	.00	.05	.07	.06	---
Adherence to Values
Father worked last week	−.09	.07	.01	.07	---
Mother worked last year	.08	.05	−.07	.06	---
No sexual fidelity conflict	.34***	.05	.35***	.06	---
Father drinks-3 or more	−.04	.05	−.04	.05	---
Father drinking/drugs interfere	−.25**	.08	−.21*	.09	---
Father uses street drugs	−.10	.10	−.22*	.10	---
Mother street drugs-pregnant	.06	.13	.29*	.14	---
Mother drinking/drugs interfere	−.18	.16	−.26	.17	---
Married	.31***	.06	.30***	.07	---
Constant	−2.32***	.15	−2.45***	.16	---
Error correlation	.37***

Note: Model controls for age, education, race, and family structure at age 15. N = 2,034 couples

^*p < .05

^**p < .01

^***p < .001 (2 tail tests)