Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2008 May 9;33(9):1154–1161. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.04.016

Table 1.

Characteristics of the baseline and follow-up samples among youth from an urban school system, Mid-Atlantic region, United States: 1985–2002a

Baseline sample (first grade) Young adulthood sample

No. % No. %
Total 2,311 1,692
Sex
  Female 1,160 50.2 902 53.3
  Male 1,151 49.8 790 46.7
Disadvantaged minority group membership
  Minority (mainly African-American) 1,550 67.1 1,218 72.0
  Nonminority (Caucasian, non-Hispanic) 761 32.9 474 28.0
Receipt of subsidized lunch in first gradeb
  No 1,093 47.4 761 45.1
  Yes (free or reduced-cost lunch) 1,212 52.6 927 54.9
First-grade cohort (year of entry to primary school)
  1 (1985) 1,196 51.8 856 50.6
  2 (1986) 1,115 48.2 836 49.4
Childhood misbehavior ratingc
  Lowest tertile 712 30.8 504 29.8
  Middle tertile 688 29.8 514 30.4
  Highest tertile 655 28.3 489 28.9
  Missing data 256 11.1 185 10.9
Standardized Risk Taking Scale Valuesd
  Lowest tertile 547 23.7 443 26.2
  Middle tertile 551 23.8 439 25.9
  Highest tertile 565 24.5 445 26.3
  Missing data 648 28.0 365 21.6
a

Young adulthood data were obtained for 1,692 of the 2,311 participants originally recruited in 1985–1986 at the time of entry into first grade. Follow up was during 2000–2002 when the participants were ages 20–24.

b

Data on the subsidized-lunch status of six children were missing at baseline.

c

Childhood misbehavior was rated in the fall of first grade according to the Teacher Observation of Classroom Adaptation-Revised (Werthamer-Larson et al. 1991). Ratings of misbehavior were missing because students transferred to other schools or due to circumstances in which the teacher could not complete the ratings.

d

Standardized risk taking scale data were missing because participants failed to answer this question in ALL five assessments (e.g., because students transferred to other school system.