Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2008 May 9;33(9):1154–1161. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.04.016

Table 2.

Estimates of unadjusted relative risk for becoming an illegal drug user or legal drug user by young adulthood among youths from an urban public school system, Mid-Atlantic region, United States: 1985–2002a

Cocaine (n = 102 users)
Cannabis (n = 1,102 users)
Tobacco (n = 1,049 users)
Alcohol (n = 1,617 users)
Covariate RR 95% CI p-value RR 95% CI p-value RR 95% CI p-value RR 95% CI p-value
Sex
  Female 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
  Male 1.8 1.2, 2.7 0.006 2.8 2.3, 3.5 <0.001 2.0 1.7, 2.5 <0.001 1.0 0.6, 1.6 0.99
Disadvantaged Minority
  Minority 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
  Nonminority 18.1 10.4, 31.7 <0.001 1.3 1.1, 1.7 0.014 2.3 1.8, 2.9 <0.001 2.1 1.1, 3.9 0.02
Subsidized/free lunch in 1st grade
  No 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
  Yes 0.3 0.2, 0.4 <0.001 0.9 0.7, 1.1 0.161 0.7 0.6, 0.9 0.002 0.6 0.4, 0.9 0.04
First-grade cohort
  1985 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
  1986 1.1 0.7, 1.6 0.76 1.0 0.8, 1.2 0.879 1.0 0.8, 1.2 0.84 1.5 0.9, 2.4 0.11
Childhood misbehavior ratingb 1.3 1.1, 1.6 0.012 1.6 1.4, 1.8 <0.001 1.3 1.1, 1.4 <0.001 1.1 0.9, 1.4 0.41
a

Data were obtained from 1,692 participants; see footnote in Table 1. These estimates of relative risk are from the generalized linear model (logit link) with a generalized estimating equations approach to address interdependencies of the four binary responses (cumulative occurrence of drug-taking by young adulthood).

b

Childhood misbehavior was rated in the fall of first grade according to the Teacher Observation of Classroom Adaptation-Revised (Werthamer-Larson, et al. 1991). Ratings of misbehavior were missing because students transferred to other schools or due to circumstances in which the teacher could not complete the ratings. Relative risk estimates are for every increase of one standard deviation above the mean of the standardized scale.