Table 2.
Effect of RLPM on the urological axis
| Patients | Follow-up (months) |
SUI (0–3) |
Frequency (min) |
Nocturia (nr/night) |
Urgency (0–2) |
Dysuria (0–2) |
|||||
| Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | ||
| Ck | 12 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 180 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Dz | 18 | 1 | 0 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rx | 12 | 0 | 0 | 180 | 180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Re | 19 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 180 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hy | 39 | 0 | 0 | 120 | 120 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Ro | 11 | 2 | 0 | 240 | 240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ns | 12 | 0 | 0 | 120 | 120 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Sn | 12 | 0 | 0 | 120 | 180 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Hs | 10 | 0 | 0 | 120 | 180 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
SUI = stress urinary incontinence
min = minutes
In this case series no patient had urge incontinence