Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Sep 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Mar 24;206(5):970–983. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.035

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Water distribution within the liver (upper panel); and water redistribution relative to sham control (lower panel). Y axis in the upper panel was divided into two segments to visualize the small intravascular volume (IVV). IFV, local interstitial fluid volume fraction; ICV, local intracellular fluid volume fraction; hatched line represents total tissue water in the sham control group; Sham, sham operation, no hemorrhage; HS, hemorrhagic shock; CR, conventional resuscitation with the return of shed blood plus 2 volumes of lactated Ringers’ solution; DPR, direct peritoneal resuscitation with 20 mL glucose-based clinical peritoneal dialysis solution IP. *p < 0.01 versus sham by two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni posttest. §p < 0.05 versus sham control by two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni posttest.