Table 1.
Rhizobial population sampled from | 6/a | 6/b | 16/c | 17/a | 17/b | 18/a | 18/b | Others† |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘Athos’ | 18a | 9c | 2b | 18a | 27a | 9a | 7a | 10 |
‘Austin’ | 18a | 16b | 10ab | 16a | 25a | 14a | 0a | 1 |
‘Frisson’ | 9a | 31a | 17a | 7a | 17a | 11a | 4a | 4 |
P118 | 6a | 25a | 8ab | 24a | 22a | 10a | 4a | 1 |
P121 | 9a | 30a | 15a | 9a | 17a | 11a | 2a | 7 |
* The IGS haplotypes are identified by numbers and the nod haplotypes by letters following the classification given in Depret et al. (2004). Means followed by different letters are significantly different based on multiple comparisons (LSD test) at the 5 % probability level.
† The distribution is given for the seven predominant rhizobial genotypes (>5 % in at least one population); the isolates distributed in six other genotypes were pooled.