Skip to main content
. 2008 Aug 27;9:401. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-401

Table 5.

Comparison of QTLs identified in the two populations after the flanking markers for each QTL were placed on the barley consensus map.

Chromosome Franklin/Yerong Franklin/TX9425

QTLs Chromosome interval (cM) Effect (%) QTLs Chromosome interval (cM) Effect (%)
1H yfy2.2-2 49–66 5 tfy1.1-3 68–73 7.1
2H yfy1.1-1 47–56 5.8 tfy1.1-1 73–82 23.3
yfsur-1 45–49 7.1 tfsur-1 82–115 19.1
tfsur-2 26–33 13.2
3H yfy2.1-2 59–90 11.9 tfy1.1-2 63–85 33.4
yfy2.2-1 59–90 9.5 tfy1.2-1 78–97 36
tfy2.1-1 63–68 34.1
4H yfy2.1-3 114–136 18.6 tfmas 80–113 16.3
yfy2.2-3 94–123 22.4
yfmas 114–136 8.2
5H yfy1.1-2 95–98 7.6
yfsur-2 86–98 13.2
7H yfy2.1-1 74–79 6.7 tfy2.1-2 50–83 16