Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep 19;283(38):25846–25853. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802671200

TABLE 7.

Liver uracil content in genomic DNA

Differences between diets were analyzed by Student's t test. Differences among genotypes and genotype × diet effects were analyzed by two-way ANOVA using Tukey's HSD post hoc analysis. Data represent mean ± S.E. values. p values ≤0.05 were considered significantly different. n = 4–7 per group.

Age
32 weeks, liver uracil
Diet Shmt1 genotype
pg uracil/μg DNA
AIN-93G Shmt1+/+ 0.13 ± 0.02
Shmt1-/+ 0.58 ± 0.16
Shmt1-/- 0.33 ± 0.08
AIN-93G minus folate and choline Shmt1+/+ 0.36 ± 0.07
Shmt1-/+ 0.32 ± 0.08
Shmt1-/- 0.15 ± 0.02
p value, diet effect NSa
p value, genotype effect 0.08
p value, diet × genotype effect 0.03b
a

NS means not significant.

b

Shmt1+/+ is significantly different from Shmt1-/+ on control diets, p < 0.05, as analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD post hoc test for genotype effect.