Table 1.

Summary of Effects From ANOVAs Testing the Participant’s Race × Evaluator’s Race × Feedback

								P × E × F
Dependent variable	MSE	P Race F test	E Race F test	F F test	P × F F test	E × F F test	P × E F test	r2	df	F test
Attributions to discrimination	0.64	0.81	6.76*	29.59***	1.58	0.56	3.11	.31	1, 110	7.35**
Emotion and motivation
External negative	2.74	0.52	1.11	31.66***	0.03	0.16	0.65	.26	1, 110	4.58**
Internal negative	2.59	0.06	0.12	1.54	0.43	0.24	0.17	.03	1, 110	0.31
Positive	2.18	5.05*	1.09	7.72**	1.22	0.04	0.69	.13	1, 110	0.00
CV reactivity
VCa	102.3	0.62	0.17	0.85	2.80	0.40	1.18	.20	1, 102	2.31
CO	2.42	0.70	3.80	1.14	1.22	0.09	0.59	.14	1, 102	8.13**
TPR	67817	0.21	1.72	1.66	1.53	1.85	0.80	.18	1, 102	15.02***
Performanceb	22.0	5.62*	1.56	0.06	0.17	1.01	0.09	.30	1, 108	8.26**
Behavioral observation
Vigilance	3.78	1.08	0.26	0.02	3.11	0.58	0.97	.09	1, 98	3.96*
External negative	0.41	0.86	0.21	1.08	0.21	0.00	2.85	.07	1, 103	3.10
Internal negative	0.32	0.01	0.39	0.02	1.96	0.19	1.34	.03	1, 103	0.07
Positive	0.31	0.60	3.63	1.30	0.58	1.59	0.66	.11	1, 103	4.91*

Note. N = 118. The degrees of freedom (df) for the three-way interactions were the same as that for the other main effects and interactions. ANOVAs = analyses of variance; MSE 3 mean square error; P = participant; E = evaluator; roman F = feedback; CV = cardiovascular; VC = ventricular contractility; CO = cardiac output; TPR = total peripheral resistance.

^aAll analyses with VC were conducted controlling for baseline VC.

^bAnalyses shown for performance were conducted controlling for past experience with similar types of word games.

^*p < .05.

^**p < .01.

^*** p < .001.