Table 2.
Protein | Ligand | Kd × 106 | ΔGo kcal mol−1 | ΔHo kcal mol−1 | -TΔSo kcal mol−1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCA** | DNSA | 0.30 ± 0.014a,b,c | −8.90 ± 0.15 | — | — |
HCA**-SSEG2CONH2 | DNSA | 0.26 ± 0.008a,b,c | −8.98 ± 0.10 | — | — |
HCA**-SCH2CO2− | DNSA | 0.23 ± 0.007a,b,c | −9.05 ± 0.10 | — | — |
Ethox | 0.0002 ± 0.00004a,b,d | −13.2 ± 0.6 | −17.7 ± 0.4e,f | +4.5 ± 0.7 | |
SA-OMe | 0.51 ± 0.018a,b | −8.58 ± 0.11 | — | — | |
SA-OMe | 0.55 ± 0.03a,e | −8.54 ± 0.16 | −6.10 ± 0.12e,f | −2.4 ± 0.2 | |
HCA**-SSEG10SA | Ethox | 6.1 ± 0.01a,e,g | −7.12 ± 0.08 | −11.0 ± 0.6e,f | +3.9 ± 0.6 |
Intrah | 33 ± 7i | −6.1 ± 0.6 | −6.7 ± 0.7e,f | +0.6 ± 0.9 |
Units of M.
Measured by fluorescence either directly or through competition with DNSA.16, 17, 24, 25 Uncertainties are 95% confidence intervals from curve-fitting.
Compare to literature value of 0.3 μM for the binding of DNSA to a Cys-206→Ser mutant of HCA.22
Compare to literature value of 0.2 nM for the binding of Ethox to bovine carbonic anhydrase II.17
Measured by calorimetry.
Uncertainties were assumed to be due primarily to errors in the quantitation of titrant.30 An uncertainty of 2% of ΔHo was taken for the binding to HCA**-SCH2CO2− and 5% of ΔHo for the binding to HCA**-SSEG10SA.
Compare to value from fluorescence of 2.4 μM (Table 2).
Thermodynamic parameters are those for the intramolecular equilibrium shown in Figure 1D.
Dimensionless.