Table 3.

Correlation between 3D SfT and 3D SfS sensitive regions with Gabor and psychophysics differences between all possible combinations of conditions (n = 15)

Cue		Region	Coordinates			Corr. with Gabor diff	Corr. with psycho. diff
			x	y	z
3D SfT	1	L caudal ITG	−50	−76	−12	0.13	0.91*
			−44	−88	−4	0.22	0.86*
	2	R caudal ITG	42	−82	−10	0.14	0.86*
			44	−66	−8	0.004	0.82*
	3	L LOS	−40	−90	12	0.18	0.98*
			−34	−86	4	0.18	0.95*
	4	R LOS	36	−90	14	0.09	0.99*
			28	−88	10	0.11	0.97*
	5	L VIPSt	−24	−72	30	−0.04	0.88*
	6	R VIPS	28	−80	20	−0.1	0.81*
			24	−72	32	0.17	0.89*
	7	R POIPSt	20	−76	48	0.17	0.98*
	8	R DIPSM	22	−62	56	0.19	0.94*
	9	L DIPSM	−26	−64	56	0.22	0.95*
	10	R DIPSAs	26	−54	64	0.18	0.93*
3D SfS	1	L caudal ITG	−48	−76	−6	−0.24	0.63 (0.62)*
	2	R caudal ITG	46	−70	−8	−0.34	0.61 (0.52)*

Note: The asterisks indicate significant correlations. The numbers between the brackets indicate correlations when shaded-blob condition is excluded from the analyses.