Skip to main content
. 2008 Jan 29;18(10):2275–2285. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm249

Table 3.

Regions of signification differential activation for the contrast “all-selection trials versus all-specified trials” in experiment 1 collapsed across action and rule events for both modalities, at threshold FDR P < 0.05, corresponding to Figure 5

Region t x, y, z (mm)
Rostral PFv (47), y > 40 5.17 −34 48 −6**
5.08 −42 50 −6
4.86 −32 50 −4
3.63 40 50 −8
Mid PFd (9/46), 18 < y < 40 4.61 50 32 30
3.56 −58 20 2
Caudal PFd (8,9), y < 18 5.56 −34 4 58**
4.55 36 8 54
3.34 −46 10 48
Caudal PFv (45) 5.85 −48 22 32**
3.98 54 24 2
Caudal PFv (44) 4.12 −50 18 6**
4.47 −50 18 18
Medial frontal cortex 4.77 2 20 50**
4.56 12 20 58
4.53 −6 32 38
Frontal operculum 4.60 −34 20 −14
Parietal cortex 6.52 −32 −62 56**
5.98 44 −64 50
5.71 50 −58 58
5.27 −48 −58 40
Medial parietal cortex 4.48 −12 −70 58
4.41 −6 −66 46
Middle temporal gyrus 4.33 −66 −36 −6

Note: Effects sizes at the peaks marked ** are illustrated in Figure 4. For frontal regions, the corresponding Brodmann area is suggested based on anatomical landmarks (8, 9, 46, 47) or probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps (44, 45).