Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychologia. 2008 Jun 4;46(12):2904–2913. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.05.028

Table 1.

Summary of behavioral, ERP, and LORETA findings for control (n=20) and depressed (n=20) subjects.

Control Subjects MDD Subjects p-value
A. Behavioral performance
 Accuracy incongruent 0.88±0.05 0.85±0.09 n.s.
 Accuracy congruent 0.93±0.05 0.93±0.06 n.s.
 Stroop effect accuracy −0.05±0.029 −0.08±0.079 n.s.
 RT incongruent 511.61±69.50 561.27±124.15 <0.001
 RT congruent 464.14±47.23 470.60±65.54 n.s.
 Stroop effect RT 47.47±35.69 90.67±70.29 <0.02
B. Scalp ERP data
 N2 incongruent 0.29±0.89 1.31±1.76 <0.001
 N2 congruent 0.46±0.93 1.28±1.67 <0.001
 N450 incongruent 2.38±1.67 2.91±2.20 <0.001
 N450 congruent 2.91±1.60 3.13±2.14 <0.05
C. LORETA data (620 ms)
 dACC incongruent −3.70±0.17 −3.76±0.15 <0.07
 dACC congruent −3.75±0.19 −3.70±0.10 n.s.
 Δ(dACC)* 0.05±0.11 −0.06±0.11 <0.005
 Left DLPFC incongruent −3.31±0.17 −3.49±0.28 <0.001
 Left DLPFC congruent −3.36±0.18 −3.39±0.21 n.s.
 Δ(left DLPFC)* 0.50±0.13 −0.10±0.18 <0.005
*

The difference score (incongruent - congruent) was calculated at the time of maximal GFP (620 ms) within the N450 time window peak; n.s. = non-significant