Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Sep 17.
Published in final edited form as: J Proteome Res. 2007 Jan;6(1):114–123. doi: 10.1021/pr060271u

Table 6.

Peptide identification results for 376 mass spectra. The experiments measured the success rate of our algorithm under different conditions: various sequence database sizes (0.5 million, 5 million, and 50 million amino acids), different numbers of de novo paths (1,5,10), and three types of searches (without PTMs, a search that simultaneously considers 10 types of PTMs but allows at most one modified amino acid in the peptide, and a search that considers 10 PTMs but allows up to two modified amino acids). The results are shown in terms of: TP - true positives (correct identifications made by the algorithm), FP - false positives (erroneous peptide identifications made the algorithm), and FN - false negatives (instances in which the algorithm did not return any peptide identification).

Decoy DB Size # De Novo Paths No PTMs 10 PTMs / 1 allowed 10 PTMs / 2 allowed

% TP % FP % FN % TP % FP % FN % TP % FP % FN
0.5 M 1 0.904 0 0.096 0.862 0 0.138 0.859 0 0.141
5 0.973 0 0.027 0.960 0.003 0.037 0.960 0.003 0.037
10 0.984 0 0.016 0.971 0.003 0.026 0.971 0.003 0.026

5M 1 0.904 0 0.096 0.857 0.005 0.138 0.854 0.005 0.141
5 0.971 0.003 0.026 0.952 0.013 0.035 0.949 0.016 0.035
10 0.981 0.003 0.016 0.960 0.013 0.026 0.955 0.019 0.026

50 M 1 0.888 0.019 0.093 0.862 0.045 0.093 0.851 0.045 0.104
5 0.952 0.021 0.027 0.920 0.059 0.021 0.915 0.056 0.029
10 0.963 0.021 0.016 0.920 0.059 0.021 0.920 0.059 0.021