Table 3.
Drug | Response | EC50 (ng mL−1) | EC80 (ng mL−1) | Emax | γ | ke0 (h−1) | SERT occupancy at 5-HTP EC50 (%) | 5-HTP score at 80% SERT occupancy (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Escitalopram | SERT occ | 11 (13) | 18 | 100 | 2.8 (23) | 0.4 | 94 | |
5-HTP score | 28 (81) | — | 100 | 0.8 (37) | 5.0 | 42 | ||
Paroxetine | SERT occ | 5.3 (139) | 18 | 100 | 1.1 (95) | 0.4 | 93 | |
5-HTP score | 52 (13) | — | 100 | 1.4 (15) | 0.8/0.8/3.0a | 17 | ||
Sertraline | SERT occ | 7.1 (20) | 24 | 100 | 1.2 (14) | 1.0 | 94 | |
5-HTP score | 80 (40) | — | 100 | NA | 1.0/0.0/5.0a | 23 |
Abbreviations: 5-HTP, 5-hydroxytryptophan; NA, not applicable; SERT, serotonin transporter.
Acute non-steady-steady data were collapsed with an effect-compartment model. A sigmoidal Emax model was fitted to the pooled data from the three doses. Emax was locked at 100% for all fits.
Low/medium/high dose, respectively.