Skip to main content
. 2003 Oct;41(10):4623–4629. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.10.4623-4629.2003

TABLE 3.

Determination of presence of MBL producers among CAZ-resistant but IPM-susceptible isolates of P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp.a

Isolates (no. tested) blaVIM-2 or blaIMP-1 status (no. of isolates) No. of isolates positive byc:
No. of isolates with the following CAZ/IPM result:
Hodge testb IPM-EDTA (1,900 μg) DDSTb CAZ-MPA (3 μl) DDSTb R/R I or R/I or R I or R/I or S S/R S/S
Consecutive
    P. aeruginosa (100) Positive (5) 4 (1) 5 5 3 2 0 0 0
Negative (95) 1 1 1 4 3 13 10 65
    Acinetobacter spp. (99) Positive (2) 1 (1) 1 (1) 1 (1) 1 1 0 0 0
Negative (97) 0 0 0 15 0 56 2 24
CAZ-nonsusceptible
    P. aeruginosa (168) Positive (38) 33 (5) 36 (2) 32 (6) 36 2 0 NA NA
Negative (130) 4 10 8 102 18 10 NA NA
    Acinetobacter spp. (73) Positive (4) 3 (1) 3 (1) 3 (1) 4 0 0 NA NA
Negative (69) 5 3 0 46 17 6 NA NA
Total (440) Positive (49) 41 (8) 45 (4) 41 (8) 44 5 0 0 0
Negative (391) 10 14 9 167 38 85 12 89
a

Abbreviations: R, resistant; I, intermediate; S, susceptible; NA, not applicable.

b

Numbers of isolates that were positive by a repeat Hodge test with Zn2+-added IPM disks, and numbers of isolates that were DDST positive by repeated tests, are given in parentheses. All of the false-positive Hodge test and DDST results were equivocal.

c

Sensitivities and specificities, excluding repeated tests, were as follows: for the Hodge test, 83.7 and 97.4%, respectively; for the IPM-EDTA DDST, 91.8 and 96.4%, respectively; and for the CAZ-MPA DDST, 83.7 and 97.7%, respectively. The differences in sensitivity and specificity between the two DDSTs were statistically significant (P < 0.01 by the chi-square test).