TABLE 2.
Common antibiogram phenotypes of MRSA isolates from 1996 through 2001
Type | % of all MRSA isolates | Phenotype for antimicrobial agenta: |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERY | CLI | GEN | LEV-CIPb | OXA | RIF | SXT | TET | VAN | ||
Major type | 64 | R | R | S | R | R | S | S | S | S |
Type 2 | 8 | R | R | R | R | R | S | R | S | S |
Type 3 | 7 | R | R | R | R | R | S | S | S | S |
Type 4 | 5 | R | S | S | R | R | S | S | S | S |
Type 5 | 3 | R | S | S | S | R | S | S | S | S |
Type 6 | 3 | R | R | S | R | R | S | S | R | S |
Type 7 | 2 | S | S | S | S | R | S | S | S | S |
All isolates were tested by using the Vitek system. ERY, erythromycin; CLI, clindamycin; GEN, gentamicin; LEV-CIP, levofloxacin-ciprofloxacin; OXA, oxacillin; RIF, rifampin; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; TET, tetracycline; VAN, vancomycin. Phenotypes were determined by comparing the results of each antimicrobial susceptibility for the 6-year period. Isolates with intermediate results were considered resistant. Differences from the major phenotype are indicated in boldface.
Ciprofloxacin was tested for the years 1996 to 1998, and levofloxacin was tested for the years 1999 to 2001.