Skip to main content
. 2003 Oct;41(10):4559–4564. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.10.4559-4564.2003

TABLE 3.

Distribution of RFT in a San Francisco test population and concordance with PFGE groupings, MLST, and spa typing

MLRFTa No. of isolates No. of MRSA isolates PFGE clone group PFGE subtype MLSTb spa type Associated epidemic clonal group (clonal complex)c
AAAAAAA 5 1 K 4 ST-1
AAAACBC 1 0 L 1 ST-25
AAABCBC 2 0 U 1 ST-22 CC22
AAACAAC 1 0 J 1 ST-20
AAACCAA 13 7 D 9 ST-5 TJMBMDMBMK NY/pediatric/Japan (CC5)
AAACCAC 6 3 B 3 ST-2 UH2GFGMDMGGM
ABDBCAB 7 1 X 5 ST-45
ACAACAA 3 0 V 3 ST-15
BBBBBAB 6 6 A 4 ST-36 WGKAKAOMQQQ EMRSA-16 (CC30)
BBBBBAB 11 5 Z 5 ST-30 WGKAKAOMQQQ CC30
CAAAAAA 5 0 Q 4 ST-109
CAAAABC 4 0 R 1 ST-97
CAAACAC 21 10 C 9 ST-8 YHGCMBQBLO Clone V (CC8)
CAABCCB 2 1 N 1 ST-121
CAACAAA 5 0 M 3 ST-188
CAFBCDB 11 10 P 4 ST-59 ZDGDGDEB
a

An RFT was defined by the combination of alleles at the seven loci (e.g., RFT-BBBBBAB in the order RFT-arcC-aroE-glpF-gmk-pta-tpi-yqiL).

b

The ST was defined according to the MLST database (http://www.mlst.net).

c

Epidemic clonal groups were defined as described by Oliveira et al. (13), and clonal complexes were defined as described by Enright et al. (6).