Skip to main content
. 1999 Jul;10(7):2309–2327. doi: 10.1091/mbc.10.7.2309

Table 1.

Microtubules are not randomly distributed with respect to intrapodia in the P domain

A  Condition B P domain area (μm2) C No. MT tips in P domain D No. intrapodia E No. MT tips ≤1 μm intrapodium F p. MT tip ≤1 μm intrapodium (πD/B) G p. ≥E colocal (1-ΣBin[<E,C])
Cntrl 52 6 2 2 0.12 0.16
Cntrl 52 9 2 1 0.12 0.68
Noc 112 5 3 2 0.08 0.06
Noc 152 8 4 3 0.08 0.03
Taxol 105 1 2 1 0.06 0.06
Taxol 61 1 1 1 0.05 0.05

In six growth cones fixed during the indicated conditions: Cntrl, untreated; Noc, after nocodazole washout; Taxol, after Taxol washin (A), We determined the area of the P domain (B), the number of microtubule (MT) tips in the P domain (C), the number of intrapodia in the P domain (D), the number of microtubule tips within 1 μm of the center of the initiation sites of the intrapodia (E), the probability that any particular microtubule would be found within 1 μm of the center of the initiation sites of the intrapodia (E), the probability that any particular microtubule would be found within 1 μm of an initiation site of any of the intrapodia if microtubules and intrapodia are distributed randomly throughout the P-domain (F) (can be viewed as the proportion of the area [B] occupied by D intrapodia initiation sites), and the probability of observing at least E colocalization events (G). This is determined by evaluating the binomial probability for less than E successes (colocalizations) for C trials (MT endings in the cone) given the probability determined in F for any particular trial (MT) to result in success (colocalization) and subtracting the chances for less than E successes from 1.0.