Table 3.
Feature | Multivariate Cox Regression Analysis* | ||
Hazard Ratio | 95% CI | P | |
DcR3 expression† | 1.8 | 1.2–2.8 | .006 |
Karnofsky performance status‡ | 1.5 | 1.0–2.3 | .09 |
Tumor extent§ | 2.0 | 1.5–3.0 | <.001 |
Regional lymph node metastasis¶ | 1.4 | 0.9–2.2 | .1 |
Distant metastasis# | 5.0 | 3.5–7.1 | <.001 |
Grade of malignancy** | 1.8 | 1.3–2.6 | <.001 |
Histopathologic subtype†† | 1.1 | 0.7–1.7 | .7 |
Type of surgery‡‡ | 2.1 | 1.0–4.6 | .06 |
Sex§§ | 0.7 | 0.5–0.9 | .02 |
CI indicates confidence interval.
Three patients with tumors of unknown grade of malignancy were excluded.
Immunohistochemical score ≥6 versus <6.
<80% versus ≥80%.
pT3/pT4 versus pT1/pT2.
pN1/pN2 versus N0/pN0.
M1/pM1 versus M0/pM0.
G3/G4 versus G1/G2.
Clear-cell (conventional) RCC versus other types.
Radical versus partial nephrectomy.
Female versus male.