TABLE 2.
Bacterial strain | Protein coating | Fmax(t = 0) (nN) | Fmax (nN) | τ |
---|---|---|---|---|
A. naeslundii T14V-J1 | Saliva | −1.3 | −6.1 | 83 |
BSA | −0.2 | −1.3 | 66 | |
S. mitis ATCC 9811 | Saliva | −1.2 | −8.4 | 17 |
BSA | −0.3 | −1.3 | 5 | |
S. mutans NS | Saliva | −0.5 | −4.4 | 51 |
BSA | −0.4 | −2.5 | 38 | |
S. oralis J22 | Saliva | −0.5 | −2.9 | 26 |
BSA | −0.2 | −1.3 | 16 | |
S. sanguinis ATCC 10556 | Saliva | −0.5 | −3.3 | 30 |
BSA | −0.3 | −1.9 | 18 | |
S. sobrinus HG1025 | Saliva | −0.4 | −3.5 | 28 |
BSA | −0.1 | −1.3 | 11 |
All data were based on 15 force curves taken from three independent bacterial cultures of each strain, yielding a mean SD of 30%, 20%, and 50% for Fmax(t = 0) and after bond strengthening Fmax and τ, respectively.