Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006 Aug 2;27(4):729–740. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600376

Table 2.

Regional loss of Nissl staining intensity post HI injury

Dietary groups and HI subgroups Hippocampal subareaa
CA1 CA3ab CA3c Dentate gyrus Parietal cortex
Iron-sufficient
15 min (n = 6) 3.3 ± 4.2 0.0 ± 2.3 0.0 ± 2.3 0.3 ± 1.1 0.9 ± 0.2
30 min (n = 6) 0.6 ± 6.2 0.0 ± 2.6 4.8 ± 5.4 0.0 ± 4.3 0.6 ± 0.2
45 min (n = 6) 6.8 ± 7.1 0.0 ± 2.1 0.1 ± 3.0 1.0 ± 1.9 0.4 ± 0.3
Iron-deficientb
15 min (n = 6) 3.7 ± 4.9 0.0 ± 1.2 0.0 ± 3.3 7.8 ± 4.6 0.2 ± 0.1
30 min (n = 9) 18.8 ± 3.0c 6.8 ± 6.9 2.5 ± 3.7 2.6 ± 2.3 0.3 ± 0.2
45 min (n = 8) 17.6 ± 6.1 2.1 ± 3.9 0.0 ± 2.9 1.8 ± 2.3 2.8 ± 1.7

Values = mean ± s.e.m. % loss of Nissl staining intensity on the HI hemisphere when compared with the corresponding brain region on the control hemisphere.

a

Nomenclature based on Johansen (1993).

b

Main effect of iron-deficiency on Nissl staining intensity loss was seen for subarea CA1 (P = 0.03, univariate ANOVA).

c

Significantly different between iron-sufficient and iron-deficient groups (P < 0.01, Bonferroni-adjusted t-test).