Skip to main content
. 2001 May 1;21(9):3196–3206. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-09-03196.2001

Table 2.

Summary of the patch experiments

Dots 10/window 10 Dots 10/window 30 Dots 30/window 10 Dots 30/window 30 l10/30 l30/10
Monkey Mo (right, 1st)2-a 52.1° /sec2-b 53.2° /sec2-b 125.1° /sec2 146.2° /sec2 0.98 0.78
Monkey Na (right)2-a 31.8° /sec2-b 32.1° /sec2-b 55.9° /sec2 61.4° /sec2 0.99 0.82
Monkey Qu (right) 48.8° /sec2 53.1° /sec2 66.5° /sec2 75.3° /sec2 0.84 0.67
Monkey Qu (left) 34.7° /sec2-b 34.5° /sec2-b 44.5° /sec2 49.8° /sec2 1.01 0.65
Monkey Qu (up) 13.5° /sec2-b 13.1° /sec2-b 18.5° /sec2 20.2° /sec2 1.06 0.75
Monkey Mo (right, 2nd) 64.9° /sec2 72.3° /sec2 110.0° /sec2 112.9° /sec2 0.85 0.94
Monkey Mo (left) 44.7° /sec2-b 44.9° /sec2-b 68.8° /sec2 70.7° /sec2 0.99 0.93
Monkey Mo (up) 31.4° /sec2-b 33.9° /sec2-b 47.6° /sec2 53.4° /sec2 0.89 0.74
Physiology (peak response) 6.4° /sec 7.6° /sec 16.1° /sec 17.8° /sec 0.90 0.85

The top eight rows report eye accelerations during the initiation of pursuit for target motion in different directions, using different monkeys, or on different days. The bottom row gives the target speed reconstructed for each target from the population response recorded in area MT.

F2-a

 Data shown in Figure 4.

F2-b

 The conditions dots 10/window 10 and dots 10/window 30 did not evoke statistically significant differences in pursuit acceleration. Note that for the two l values >1, there was no significant difference between the dots 10/window 10 and dots 10/window 30 conditions.

All measurements were based on at least 28 trials.