Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct;19(10):1989–1999. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007121291

Table 4.

Results from linear regression of ln(eGFR) and ln(cystatin C) and logistic regression of eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at the FHS cycle 7 examination on rs12255372 and rs7903146 in FHS participantsa

SNP Coefficient SE P n
Linear regression of ln(eGFR)
    rs12255372
        overall −0.015 0.008 0.047 2306
        no diabetes −0.009 0.008 0.261 2041
    rs7903146
        overall −0.018 0.007 0.010 2323
        no diabetes −0.013 0.007 0.066 2056
Linear regression of ln(cystatin C)
    rs12255372
        overall 0.016 0.006 0.006 2263
        no diabetes 0.013 0.006 0.015 2004
        HbA1c <6.0% 0.015 0.005 0.006 1596
        FPG <100 mg/dl 0.010 0.007 0.159 1231
    rs7903146
        overall 0.016 0.006 0.004 2279
        no diabetes 0.014 0.005 0.010 2018
        HbA1c <6.0% 0.014 0.005 0.001 1602
        FPG <100 mg/dl 0.009 0.007 0.177 1237
Logistic regression of eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 OR
95% CI
P
n
    rs12255372
        overall 1.13 0.91 to 1.40 0.253 2306
        no diabetes 1.09 0.86 to 1.39 0.472 2041
    rs7903146
        overall 1.18 0.98 to 1.41 0.079 2323
        no diabetes 1.18 0.96 to 1.46 0.115 2056
a

Model adjusted for age, gender, SBP, antihypertensive medication intake, BMI, fasting glucose, smoking, and diabetes in the overall model. OR, odds ratio; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; FPG, fasting plasma glucose.