. 2007 Apr 19;32(5):597–604. doi: 10.1007/s00264-007-0364-3

Table 4.

Hip revision arthroplasty studies since 2000

Author	Year	Number of hips	Findings related to revision in total hip arthroplasty
Lachiewicz et al. [10]	2005	100^a	• 38% (15%)^c loosening components
			• Loosening acetabular cup 22% {24%}
			• Loose hemiarthroplasty 13% (6%)
			• Infection 10% (7%)
			• Loosening femoral comp 8% (22%)
			• Periprosthetic fracture 2% (3%)
			• recurrent dislocation 2% (16%)
			• osteolysis poly wear 1% (7%)
Clohisy et al. [4]	2004	439^a	• 7% infection
Clohisy et al. [4]	2004	439^a	• 5% for periprosthetic fracture
Weeder et al. [24]	2002	188^a	• 82% aseptic loosening
			• 8% infection
			• 5% periprosthetic fracture
			• 14% instability
Lind et al. [11]	2002	87^b	• 83 aseptic loosening
Lind et al. [11]	2002	87^b	• 4 infection
Ullmak et al. [22]	2002	57^b	• 59 aseptic loosening
Ullmak et al. [22]	2002	57^b	• 3 infection
Bohm et al. [3]	2001	129^b	• 97 aseptic loosening
			• 16 infection
			• 13 periprosthetic fracture
Templeton et al. [21]	2001	61^b	• 56 aseptic loosening
			• 2 instability
			• 3 periprosthetic fracture
Crwaford et al. [5]	2000	74^b	• 4 instability
Crwaford et al. [5]	2000	74^b	• 3 component failure

^aReasons for failure; given as a percentage of the group

^bReason for failure; given as the number of patients

^cPercentage of patients 10 years apart is given in parentheses