Table 3.
A. | FLZM P | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | FLZM | Ro15-1788 | BCCM | GABA | PENTO | ||||||
Receptor | k2 (M −1 s−1) | n | k2 (M−1 s−1) | n | k2 (M −1 s−1) | n | k2 (M−1 s−1) | n | k2 (M−1 s−1) | n | k2 (M −1 s−1) |
α1H101C β2 γ2 | 2194.6 ± 354.1 | 6 | 678.3 ± 145.8* | 4 | 59.0 ± 18.2* | 3 | ND | 9047.5 ± 1494.0* | 4 | 2299.0 ± 457.6 | |
α1N102C β2 γ2 | 46.7 ± 5.5 | 7 | 30.9 ± 3.0 | 3 | # | 16.9 ± 3.7* | 3 | 91.2 ± 24.7* | 3 | 54.5 ± 14.9 | |
α1 S106C β2 γ2 | 28.9 ± 8.2 | 6 | 45.6 ± 7.5* | 3 | 11.9 ± 3.1* | 3 | ND | 20.0 ± 5.4 | 3 | ND |
B. | I-GABA | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | FLZM | Ro15-1788 | BCCM | GABA | PENTO | ||||||
Receptor | k 2 (M−1 s−1) | n | k 2 (M−1 s−1 ) | n | k 2 (M −1s−1) | n | k 2 (M−1 s−1 ) | n | k 2 (M−1 s−1 ) | n | k 2 (M −1s−1) |
α1D97C β2 γ2 | 20.5 ± 5.7 | 6 | 9.2 ± 3.3* | 3 | # | Block | 20.6 ± 5.2 | 3 | ND | ||
α1H101C β2 γ−;2 | 122.3 ± 10.8 | 5 | 117.2 ± 5.0 | 4 | 289.8 ± 136.8* | 5 | ND | 154.4 ± 42.6 | 5 | ND | |
α1N102C β2 γ2 | 52.9 ± 22.1 | 8 | 32.1 ± 11.7 | 3 | # | 11.7 ± 1.0* | 3 | 81.2 ± 9.2 | 3 | 124.2 ± 47.7* | |
α1 S106C β2 γ2 | 11.3 ± 3.9 | 7 | 12.0 ± 4.0 | 3 | 7.0 ± 1.0 | 4 | ND | 9.7 ± 5.3 | 3 | ND | |
α1 H101C β2 | 121.4 ± 40.4 | 5 | 101.4 ± 27.7 | 3 | 145.8 ± 19.3 | 3 | ND | 166.5 ± 34.4 | 4 | ND |
A. The rates of decrease in FLZM potentiation resulting from MTSEA-Biotin application. B. The rates of change in I-GABA resulting from MTSEA-Biotin application. Data represent mean ±SD.
indicates significant differences from control rates (p < 0.05) for each receptor.
rates were not measured because Ro15-1788 potentiated I-GABA. “Block” indicates that BCCM slowed the rate of modification of α1D97C to the extent that a rate could not be accurately determined using the available MTSEA-Biotin concentrations. ND = data not determined.