Table 2.
Improvement of protein secondary structure prediction with the addition of two "residue-specific" RSA thresholds, compared with this improvement using a fixed [4%, 16%] RSA threshold.
| Applied Threshold | |||
| Fixed([4%,16%]) | Mean ± standard deviation | Tertiles | |
| A | -3.03 | -0.83 | -0.93 |
| C | 2.63 | 1.92 | 0.74 |
| D | -0.95 | 1.70 | 1.50 |
| E | -2.54 | -1.02 | 3.98 |
| F | 0.71 | 10.14 | 9.44 |
| G | 0.90 | 9.28 | 7.94 |
| H | -4.30 | -2.14 | -3.30 |
| I | -7.49 | -14.49 | -15.16 |
| K | 10.37 | 26.73 | 13.31 |
| L | 3.04 | 4.14 | 2.87 |
| M | -3.58 | -5.45 | -5.57 |
| N | -1.21 | 2.46 | -0.10 |
| P | 1.14 | 2.47 | 1.84 |
| Q | 0.53 | 0.07 | -0.76 |
| R | 2.80 | 5.10 | 3.04 |
| S | 4.36 | 13.13 | 12.32 |
| T | 3.27 | 8.84 | 5.81 |
| V | 1.57 | 0.13 | -5.72 |
| W | -2.30 | 0.40 | 0.25 |
| Y | 4.17 | 9.73 | 10.30 |
| Total Improvement | 5.44 | 8.24 | 7.17 |
The values show percentage of improvement using leave-one-out cross-validation. The bold-underlined values are those values that show improvements when they are compared with the original GOR method. See the text for more details.