Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep 17;2(9):e296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000296

Table 5. Likelihood ratio statistics of different models.

Locus Comparison Df lnL X2 Critical value (1%)
GP43 One-ratio (M0) vs. Discrete (M 3) 4 10.966608 9.21
Neutral (M 1) vs. Selection (M 2) 2 18.10675 13.28
Beta (M 7) vs. Beta+w (M 8) 2 18.641266 9.21
FKS One-ratio (M0) vs. Discrete (M 3) 4 0 9.21
Neutral (M 1) vs. Selection (M 2) 2 0 13.28
Beta (M 7) vs. Beta+w (M 8) 2 0 9.21
CDC42 One-ratio (M0) vs. Discrete (M 3) 4 1.4568 9.21
Neutral (M 1) vs. Selection (M 2) 2 2.676 13.28
Beta (M 7) vs. Beta+w (M 8) 2 2.6354 9.21
P27 One-ratio (M0) vs. Discrete (M 3) 4 0 9.21
Neutral (M 1) vs. Selection (M 2) 2 0 13.28
Beta (M 7) vs. Beta+w (M 8) 2 0 9.21

Twice the difference in log likelihood ratio between a null model and an alternative model was compared with a χ2 distribution in order to test whether an alternative model fits the data better than the null model. Df: Degrees of Freedom; LRT: Likelihood Ratio Test.