Table 5. Likelihood ratio statistics of different models.
Locus | Comparison | Df | lnL | X2 Critical value (1%) |
GP43 | One-ratio (M0) vs. Discrete (M 3) | 4 | 10.966608 | 9.21 |
Neutral (M 1) vs. Selection (M 2) | 2 | 18.10675 | 13.28 | |
Beta (M 7) vs. Beta+w (M 8) | 2 | 18.641266 | 9.21 | |
FKS | One-ratio (M0) vs. Discrete (M 3) | 4 | 0 | 9.21 |
Neutral (M 1) vs. Selection (M 2) | 2 | 0 | 13.28 | |
Beta (M 7) vs. Beta+w (M 8) | 2 | 0 | 9.21 | |
CDC42 | One-ratio (M0) vs. Discrete (M 3) | 4 | 1.4568 | 9.21 |
Neutral (M 1) vs. Selection (M 2) | 2 | 2.676 | 13.28 | |
Beta (M 7) vs. Beta+w (M 8) | 2 | 2.6354 | 9.21 | |
P27 | One-ratio (M0) vs. Discrete (M 3) | 4 | 0 | 9.21 |
Neutral (M 1) vs. Selection (M 2) | 2 | 0 | 13.28 | |
Beta (M 7) vs. Beta+w (M 8) | 2 | 0 | 9.21 |
Twice the difference in log likelihood ratio between a null model and an alternative model was compared with a χ2 distribution in order to test whether an alternative model fits the data better than the null model. Df: Degrees of Freedom; LRT: Likelihood Ratio Test.