Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep 2;36(17):5652–5659. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn525

Table 4.

Measured and predicted thermodynamic parameters for test sequence duplex formationa

Average of curve fits
Tm−1 vs log Ct plots
Sequences −ΔHo (kcal/mol) −ΔSo (e.u.) −ΔGo (kcal/mol) Tmb (°C) −ΔHo (kcal/mol) −ΔSo (e.u.) −ΔGo37 (kcal/mol) Tmb (°C)
    UGAGUAC 50.8 145.0 5.8 32.6 44.1 122.6 6.1 33.7
UUGCUCG (35.2) (98.0) (4.8) (22.6)
(37.6) (104.2) (5.2) (27.2)
    UGAGUAA 54.5 156.9 5.8 33.0 41.6 115.3 5.9 32.3
GUGCUCG (35.2) (98.0) (4.8) (22.6)
(38.6) (106.7) (5.4) (29.1)
    UGAGUUC 55.7 162.3 5.4 30.5 57.2 167.0 5.4 30.9
AGGCUCG (34.9) (98.2) (4.5) (19.6)
(37.3) (104.7) (4.9) (23.6)
    UACAGGC 54.7 159.9 5.1 29.0 48.8 140.6 5.2 28.8
AAGUGUC (41.0) (117.2) (4.7) (23.5)
(43.5) (123.9) (5.2) (27.0)
    UGCUGAU 49.9 142.6 5.6 31.6 53.8 155.1 5.7 32.1
UGACGAU (39.8) (112.5) (4.9) (25.6)
(42.3) (119.2) (5.4) (28.6)

aSolutions are 1.0 M NaCl, 10 mM sodium cacodylate, 0.5 mM EDTA pH 7.

bCalculated at 10−4 M oligomer concentration. Values in parenthesis are predicted: top row is the predicted values for single 3′ terminal overhang duplexes and bottom row is the predicted values as described in the text for duplexes with 3′ double overhangs.