Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 10;4(10):e1000212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000212

Table 3. Comparison between MSTmap, JoinMap, Carthagene and Record for n = 100 and m = 100.

n, m = 100 MSTmap Record Carthagene JoinMap
γ η E time E time E time E time
0.00 0.00 1.50 1.3 1.3 2.1 2.5 255.0 1.7 <60
0.00 0.01 15.10 4.0 46.6 1.7 58.2 275.7 - -
0.00 0.05 41.37 7.7 129.1 2.3 300.3 267.4 - -
0.00 0.10 96.53 12.0 450.8 3.2 680.0 265.2 - -
0.00 0.15 221.03 17.0 1064.8 3.7 1378.5 276.8 - -
0.01 0.00 1.83 1.3 34.7 2.0 2.8 300.1 - -
0.05 0.00 6.47 1.2 44.0 2.4 5.4 363.1 - -
0.10 0.00 18.07 1.1 49.7 2.7 7.0 416.6 - -
0.15 0.00 16.13 1.0 64.8 2.9 9.0 486.2 - -
0.01 0.01 11.47 4.2 54.8 2.7 49.0 310.0 53.7 <60
0.05 0.05 52.90 9.9 164.1 3.9 296.4 368.4 370.2 <60
0.10 0.10 140.67 17.1 683.4 6.0 837.0 430.2 - -
0.15 0.15 379.17 23.7 1387.4 7.6 1273.3 500.1 - -

Each number presented in the table is averaged over 30 independent runs, except for those of JoinMap, which are averaged over 10 independent runs. Column E reports the average number of erroneous marker pairs. The running time is reported as number of seconds.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure