Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Struct Biol. 2008 Mar 21;162(3):436–450. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2008.02.008

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Classification results as confusion matrices on the phantom experiment for two experimental conditions. (a) Classification results after the first iteration of the algorithm for SNR = 0.04 and tilt alignment errors of ±2.5 pixels. (b) Result after five iterations shows successful separation of the five phantom configurations M, D1, D2, T1 and T2. (c) Classification results after nine iterations for SNR = 0.018 and alignment shifts of ±5 pixels. Most configurations can still be correctly separated, except D1 and D2 which become indistinguishable from one another due to the very high noise level.