Table II.
SNPs in the AKR1C3 gene associated with bladder cancer risk, adjusted for gender, age, region and smoking status (1150 cases and 1149 controls)
| AKR1C3 SNP | Genotype | Cases |
Controls |
OR | 95% CI | P value | ||
| n | % | n | % | |||||
| rs1937845 (GoldenGate assay) | AA | 355 | 33 | 300 | 29 | 1.00 | Reference | |
| −488A>G | AG | 541 | 50 | 518 | 50 | 0.86 | 0.70–1.06 | 0.15 |
| Highly correlated with rs12529 | GG | 189 | 17 | 215 | 21 | 0.74 | 0.57–0.96 | 0.02 |
| Per allele risk | 0.86 | 0.75–0.98 | 0.02 | |||||
| rs3763676 (GoldenGate assay) | AA | 443 | 41 | 471 | 46 | 1.00 | Reference | |
| −137A>G | AG | 498 | 46 | 433 | 42 | 1.28 | 1.05–1.55 | 0.01 |
| Highly correlated with rs1937843 | GG | 145 | 13 | 128 | 12 | 1.19 | 0.89–1.58 | 0.23 |
| Per allele risk | 1.14 | 1.00–1.30 | 0.05 | |||||
| rs4881400 (iPLEX assay) | TT | 558 | 63 | 523 | 60 | 1.00 | Reference | |
| IVS5-256T>G | GT | 294 | 33 | 294 | 34 | 0.92 | 0.75–1.14 | 0.45 |
| GG | 32 | 4 | 56 | 6 | 0.53 | 0.33–0.85 | 0.01 | |
| Per allele risk | 0.83 | 0.70–0.98 | 0.03 | |||||
| rs12775701 (iPLEX assay) | GG | 230 | 26 | 263 | 30 | 1.00 | Reference | |
| IVS7+336A>G | GA | 437 | 49 | 413 | 47 | 1.22 | 0.96–1.54 | 0.10 |
| AA | 221 | 25 | 198 | 23 | 1.34 | 1.02–1.76 | 0.04 | |
| Per allele risk | 1.16 | 1.01–1.33 | 0.04 | |||||
| rs4641368 (iPLEX assay) | CC | 663 | 75 | 610 | 70 | 1.00 | Reference | |
| IVS8+584C>T | CT | 212 | 24 | 239 | 27 | 0.82 | 0.66–1.03 | 0.09 |
| TT | 11 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 0.42 | 0.20–0.91 | 0.03 | |
| Per allele risk | 0.78 | 0.64–0.95 | 0.01 | |||||
This table shows findings for a subset of the 24 SNPs evaluated in the AKR1C3 gene significantly associated with bladder cancer risk. See supplementary Table 1 (available at Carcinogenesis Online) for findings on all SNPs evaluated; GoldenGate genotyping assays were performed among 1086 cases and 1033 controls. iPLEX genotyping assays were performed on 946 cases and 912 controls. See Materials and Methods and Table I for details.
Note: Differences between cell counts in table and total number of cases and controls are due to missing genotype data.