Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychol. 2008 Sep;44(5):1497–1504. doi: 10.1037/a0012614

Table 2.

Main Effects of HLM Model for Alcohol Use

High School
Change from High School to College
Fixed Effect Coefficient SE T-ratio p-value d Coefficient SE T-ratio p-value d
Intercept −0.316 0.032 −9.755 .000 0.171 0.016 10.590 .000
Gender
0.015
0.041
0.359
.719
.02
0.036
0.020
1.800
.072
.08
Urban 0.166 0.047 3.517 .001 .16 −0.050 0.022 −2.252 .024 .10
Rural
0.248
0.067
3.723
.000
.17
−0.020
0.030
−0.645
.519
.03
With Family −0.183 0.090 −2.024 .043 .09 −0.100 0.039 −2.538 .012 .11
Private Dorm 0.301 0.061 4.934 .000 .22 0.048 0.026 1.832 .067 .08
Off-Campus 0.120 0.072 1.655 .098 .07 −0.043 0.030 −1.461 .144 .07

Note. Coefficients for all residence groups represent contrasts relative to campus dorms, and coefficients for area of residence represent contrasts relative to individuals from suburban high schools. Family structure was coded 0 for two-parent households and 1 for households without two resident parents such that positive coefficients reflect increased risk in households without two resident parents.