Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep 23;99(Suppl 1):S30–S32. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604579

Table 2. Trends in the deprivation gap in relative survival (%) by sex, time since diagnosis and calendar period of diagnosis: England and Wales, adults (15–99 years) diagnosed during 1986–1999 and followed up to 2001.

    Calendar period of diagnosisa
Average change (%) Predictionc for patients
    1986–1990
1991–1995
1996–1999
every 5 yearsb
diagnosed during 2000–2001
Time since diagnosis   Deprivation gap (%) 95% CI Deprivation gap (%) 95% CI Deprivation gap (%) 95% CI Deprivation gap (%) 95% CI Deprivation gap (%) 95% CI
1 year Men 5.4** (−7.3, −3.6) 4.8** (−6.4, −3.1) 8.1** (−9.7, −6.4) 1.4* (−2.7, −0.1) 9.7* (−12.0, −7.4)
  Women 4.6** (−6.7, −2.5) 4.4** (−6.4, −2.5) 6.9** (−9.0, −4.9) 1.2 (−2.8, 0.3) 5.7* (−8.5, −2.9)
5 years Men 4.7** (−6.8, −2.6) 6.0** (−8.0, −4.0) 9.4** (−12.0, −6.8) 2.4** (−4.1, −0.6) 9.8* (−13.0, −6.7)
  Women 3.7** (−6.1, −1.3) 6.7** (−9.0, −4.3) 8.3** (−11.4, −5.2) 2.5* (−4.5, −0.5) 9.4* (−13.1, −5.7)
10 years Men 3.6** (−6.0, −1.3) 8.7** (−11.3, −6.2)     5.1** (−8.5, −1.7) 11.2* (−14.9, −7.5)
  Women 3.9** (−6.5, −1.4) 5.8** (−8.6, −3.0)     1.9 (−5.7, 1.9) 7.9* (−12.1, −3.6)

CI=confidence interval.

a

Survival estimated with cohort or complete approach (see Rachet et al, 2008).

b

Mean absolute change (%) in the deprivation gap in survival every 5 years, adjusted for the underlying trend in survival (see Rachet et al, 2008).

c

Survival estimated with hybrid approach (see Rachet et al, 2008).

*P<0.05; **P<0.01.