Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep 23;99(Suppl 1):S11–S13. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604572

Table 2. Trends in the deprivation gap in relative survival (%) by sex, time since diagnosis and calendar period of diagnosis: England and Wales, adults (15–99 years) diagnosed during 1986–1999 and followed up to 2001.

    Calendar period of diagnosisa
Average change (%) Predictionc for patients
    1986–1990
1991–1995
1996–1999
every 5 yearsb
diagnosed during 2000–2001
Time since diagnosis   Deprivation gap (%) 95% CI Deprivation gap (%) 95% CI Deprivation gap (%) 95% CI Deprivation gap (%) 95% CI Deprivation gap (%) 95% CI
1 year Men −3.3** (−5.6, −1.0) −5.2** (−7.3, −3.0) −4.8** (−7.2, −2.4) −0.8 (−2.6, 0.9) −5.0** (−8.4, −1.6)
  Women −2.0 (−4.8, 0.9) −4.1** (−6.8, −1.4) −2.1 (−5.0, 0.9) −0.1 (−2.3, 2.0) −3.9 (−8.0, 0.2)
5 years Men 0.7 (−0.7, 2.1) −0.8 (−2.0, 0.5) −1.9* (−3.8, −0.1) −1.4* (−2.6, −0.1) −2.6* (−4.8, −0.4)
  Women −0.9 (−2.8, 1.0) −1.8* (−3.5, −0.1) −0.2 (−2.4, 2.0) 0.3 (−1.2, 1.8) −0.3 (−2.9, 2.3)
10 years Men 1.5* (0.1, 2.9) −1.2 (−2.5, 0.2)     −2.7** (−4.6, −0.7) −2.3* (−4.6, 0.0)
  Women −0.2 (−2.1, 1.7) −1.0 (−2.8, 0.9)     −0.7 (−3.4, 1.9) 0.1 (−2.5, 2.7)

CI=confidence interval.

a

Survival estimated with cohort or complete approach (see Rachet et al, 2008).

b

Mean absolute change (%) in the deprivation gap in survival every 5 years, adjusted for the underlying trend in survival (see Rachet et al, 2008).

c

Survival estimated with hybrid approach (see Rachet et al, 2008).

*P<0.05; **P<0.01.