Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep 23;99(Suppl 1):S104–S106. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604605

Table 2. Trends in the deprivation gap in relative survival (%) by sex, time since diagnosis and calendar period of diagnosis: England and Wales, adults (15–99 years) diagnosed during 1986–1999 and followed up to 2001.

    Calendar period of diagnosisa
       
    1986–1990
1991–1995
1996–1999
Average change (%) every 5 yearsb
Predictionc for patients diagnosed during 2000–2001
Time since diagnosis   Deprivation gap (%) 95% CI Deprivation gap (%) 95% CI Deprivation gap (%) 95% CI Deprivation gap (%) 95% CI Deprivation gap (%) 95% CI
1 year Men −5.1** (−7.6, −2.5) −7.7** (−10.0, −5.5) −5.9** (−8.3, −3.6) −0.4 (−2.2, 1.4) −6.7** (−9.9, −3.4)
  Women −5.0** (−7.7, −2.2) −8.0** (−10.4, −5.6) −5.7** (−8.1, −3.2) −0.3 (−2.3, 1.6) −4.7** (−8.1, −1.3)
5 years Men −4.4** (−7.3, −1.5) −5.5** (−8.1, −2.9) −7.3** (−10.4, −4.1) −1.5 (−3.8, 0.7) −7.5** (−11.5, −3.6)
  Women −5.3** (−8.4, −2.2) −8.9** (−11.6, −6.1) −5.4** (−8.9, −1.9) −0.4 (−2.8, 2.1) −3.5 (−7.6, 0.7)
10 years Men −2.1 (−5.2, 1.0) −4.9** (−7.9, −1.8)     −2.7 (−7.1, 1.6) −7.0** (−11.5, −2.5)
  Women −2.7 (−6.0, 0.5) −8.7** (−12.2, −5.3)     −6.0* (−10.7, −1.3) −8.2** (−12.9, −3.4)

CI=confidence interval.

a

Survival estimated with cohort or complete approach (see Rachet et al, 2008).

b

Mean absolute change (%) in the deprivation gap in survival every 5 years, adjusted for the underlying trend in survival (see Rachet et al, 2008).

c

Survival estimated with hybrid approach (see Rachet et al, 2008).

*P<0.05; **P<0.01.