Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep 23;99(Suppl 1):S26–S29. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604578

Table 2. Trends in the deprivation gap in relative survival (%) by sex, time since diagnosis and calendar period of diagnosis: England and Wales, adults (15–99 years) diagnosed during 1986–1999 and followed up to 2001.

    Calendar period of diagnosisa
Average change (%) Predictionc for patients
    1986–1990
1991–1995
1996–1999
every 5 yearsb
diagnosed during 2000–2001
Time since diagnosis   Deprivation gap (%) 95% CI Deprivation gap (%) 95% CI Deprivation gap (%) 95% CI Deprivation gap (%) 95% CI Deprivation gap (%) 95% CI
1 year Men −2.9** (−4.5, −1.2) −5.1** (−6.6, −3.6) −7.1** (−8.7, −5.6) −2.2** (−3.5, −1.0) −7.8** (−10.0, −5.6)
  Women −4.2** (−5.7, −2.6) −5.3** (−6.8, −3.9) −6.7** (−8.3, −5.1) −1.4* (−2.5, −0.2) −6.8** (−9.1, −4.5)
5 years Men −2.2* (−4.1, −0.3) −4.3** (−6.1, −2.6) −5.7** (−8.0, −3.4) −1.9* (−3.4, −0.3) −6.0** (−8.8, −3.3)
  Women −3.3** (−5.0, −1.6) −6.2** (−7.8, −4.5) −7.3** (−9.4, −5.1) −2.2** (−3.6, −0.8) −7.2** (−9.8, −4.5)
10 years Men −1.3 (−3.5, 0.8) −4.0** (−6.3, −1.8)     −2.7 (−5.8, 0.4) −5.3** (−8.6, −2.1)
  Women −3.1** (−5.0, −1.3) −7.1** (−9.1, −5.1)     −4.0** (−6.7, −1.3) −7.9** (−10.9, −4.9)

CI=confidence interval.

a

Survival estimated with cohort or complete approach (see Rachet et al, 2008).

b

Mean absolute change (%) in the deprivation gap in survival every 5 years, adjusted for the underlying trend in survival (see Rachet et al, 2008).

c

Survival estimated with hybrid approach (see Rachet et al, 2008).

*P<0.05; **P<0.01.