Table 1.

Performance measures

Rank	P	r	F	signif	% alt
1	0.8848	0.8597	0.8721	4-19	32.48
2	0.8930	0.8449	0.8683	6-19	14.02
3	0.8493	0.8828	0.8657	6-19	14.08
4	0.8727	0.8541	0.8633	7-19	31.77
5	0.8577	0.8680	0.8628	7-19	16.67
6	0.8271	0.8932	0.8589	7-19	16.02
7	0.8697	0.8255	0.8470	8-19	14.83
8	0.8435	0.8139	0.8285	10-19	14.57
9	0.8628	0.7966	0.8284	10-19	14.55
10	0.8554	0.7683	0.8095	11-19	19.76
11	0.7295	0.8849	0.7997	13-19	16.82
12	0.9267	0.6891	0.7905	14-19	19.73
13	0.8883	0.6970	0.7811	15-19	37.05
14	0.8046	0.7361	0.7688	16-19	20.43
15	0.8228	0.7108	0.7627	17-19	16.80
16	0.8432	0.6857	0.7563	17-19	34.02
17	0.7168	0.6233	0.6668	18-19	28.23
18	0.6056	0.6411	0.6229	19	31.71
19	0.5009	0.4612	0.4802	-	28.46

The precision, recall, and F score for the best submitted run from each of 19 workshop participants, sorted by F score. Each team has an F score that has a statistically significant comparison (P < 0.05) with the teams indicated in the signif column. The column labeled % alt is the percentage of true positives in the submission that matched an ALTGENE annotation.