Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2007 Oct 17;20(3):243–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2007.01021.x

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effect of substance P antagonist (10−5 mol L−1) on the inhibitory electrical field stimulation (EFS) response in naïve control (NC) (3 Hz) and small bowel transplantation (SBT) (6 Hz) for the entire 10-s interval (A), the first 4 s (B) and the last 6 s (C) of EFS; #P < 0.05 (ANOVA) compared to control response. The substance P antagonist increased EFS-induced inhibition during the entire 10 s and the last 6 s of EFS to a similar extent in both groups. EFS-induced inhibition was unaffected by the substance P antagonist during the first 4 s of EFS.