Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Oct 6.
Published in final edited form as: Criminol Public Policy. 2007;6(1):131–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2007.00426.x

TABLE 4.

VARIATION IN DISPOSITION AMONG MPV ARRESTEES, NYC 1992–2003 (RESULTS OF MULTINOMIAL LOGISTIC REGRESSION)

Odds Ratio by Dispositiona
Covariates and X2-Statisticb Time Served Fine Jail
Intercept Odds (%) 8.3:100 (7.7%) 14.5:100 (12.7%) 1.1:100 (1.1%)
Prior Arrests (68,644.6)
 0 0.0 0.1 0.1
 1c 1.0 1.0 1.0
 2 1.4 1.2 2.2
 3–9 3.2 1.5 7.7
 10+ 6.2 1.6 28.7
Race/Ethnicity (15,957.2)
 Blackc 1.0 1.0 1.0
 Hispanic 1.1 1.4 1.0
 White 0.8 1.4 0.6
 Other 0.6 1.1 0.6
Age (16,351.6)
 16–17 0.6 0.6 1.1
 18–20 0.8 0.8 1.1
 21–29c 1.0 1.0 1.0
 30–39 1.3 1.1 1.0
 40+ 1.4 0.9 1.0
Gender (15,309.4)
 Malec 1.0 1.0 1.0
 Female 0.9 0.7 0.9
Year (16,945.6)
 1992 0.7 2.5 1.9
 1993 0.6 1.7 1.1
 1994 0.6 1.3 1.3
 1995 0.6 0.5 1.1
 1996 0.7 0.6 1.2
 1997 0.8 0.7 0.9
 1998 1.1 0.7 0.9
 1999 1.2 0.8 1.0
 2000c 1.0 1.0 1.0
 2001 1.0 0.9 0.9
 2002 0.9 0.9 1.0
 2003 0.8 1.4 1.2
a

The reference category for the categorical dependent variable is case disposed.

b

The X2-test examines the significance of the variation across all 4 categories of the dependent variable. The test for each independent variable was statistically significant at the α = 0.01 level.

c

Reference category of independent variable.