Table 1.
Case | Age | Gender | Diagnosisa | Site | GFAP | EphA2 | IL-13Ra2 | Survivin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSG | ||||||||
1 | 5 | f | Low grade | Medulla | 1+ | – | 1+ | 1+ |
2 | 15 | m | High-grade | Pons | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | – |
3 | 7 | f | High-grade | Pons | 2+ | – | 1+ | – |
4 | 8 | f | Low-grade | Medulla | 1+ | – | 1+ | 1+ |
5 | 17 | m | High-grade | Pons | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 2+ |
6 | 6 | m | High-grade | Pons | 2+ | – | – | – |
7 | 4 | f | High-grade | Pons | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ |
8 | 7.5 | f | High-grade | Pons | 1+ | – | 1+ | – |
9 | 4 | f | Low-grade | Medulla | 2+ | 1+ | 1+ | 2+ |
10 | 7 | m | High-grade | Pons | 2+ | 1+ | – | – |
11 | N/A | Malignant | Pons | 1+ | – | – | 2+ | |
12 | N/A | Malignant | Pons | 1+ | – | – | 1+ | |
13 | N/A | Malignant | Pons | 1+ | – | – | 2+ | |
14 | 4.9 | m | Low-grade | Medulla | 1+ | 2+ | 2+ | – |
15 | 0.7 | m | Low-grade | Pons | 1+ | 2+ | 1+ | – |
NBSG | ||||||||
1 | 1.2 | f | gbm | Temporofrontal | 1+ | 2+ | 1+ | 1+ |
2 | 1.2 | f | aa | Thalamus | 1+ | 1+ | – | – |
3 | 16.7 | f | aa | Frontoparietal | 1+ | 2+ | 1+ | 1+ |
4 | 0.8 | f | Low-grade | Frontal | 1+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ |
5 | 1.4 | f | aa | Basal ganglia | 1+ | 2+ | N/A | 1+ |
6 | 15.6 | m | aa | Frontal | 1+ | 2+ | N/A | 1+ |
7 | 18 | f | gbm | Frontal | 1+ | 1+ | N/A | – |
8 | 11.5 | m | Low-grade | Parieto-frontal | 1+ | 2+ | 1+ | 1+ |
9 | 9.5 | m | Low-grade | Parietal | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | – |
10 | 12.9 | m | gbm | Thalamus | 1+ | 2+ | 1+ | 1+ |
11 | 6.5 | m | Low-grade | Frontal | 1+ | 2+ | 1+ | 1+ |
12 | 6.3 | f | gbm | Parietofrontal | 1+ | 1+ | – | – |
N/A, information not available
Because of the small sizes of many of the specimens, histological diagnoses of the brainstem gliomas are broadly characterized into low-grade and high-grade lesions—no attempt was made to distinguish presumptive grade III (AA) from grade IV (GBM) tumors