Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biopolymers. 2008 Nov;89(11):1002–1011. doi: 10.1002/bip.21049

Table 3.

Intramolecular interaction energies (kJ·mol-1) in FGG, WGG and YGG

FGG
WGG
YGG
conformer wp H-bond Total wp H-bond Total wp H-bond Total
0 -4.2 -37.1 -41.3 -26.6 -37.6 -64.2 -4.3 -37.3 -41.5
1 -4.1 -39.8 -43.9 -32.3 -19.7 -52.0 -3.8 -39.4 -43.3
2 -1.2 -39.7 -40.9 -2.8 -39.2 -41.9 -6.0 -37.7 -43.7
3 1.4 -41.0 -39.5 -14.9 -19.4 -34.3 -4.0 -38.7 -42.7
4 -3.6 -37.5 -41.1 -21.9 -19.6 -41.5 -4.4 -38.5 -42.9
5 -16.2 -19.4 -35.6 1.2 -39.2 -38.1 3.0 -41.7 -38.7
6 -9.4 -19.4 -28.7 -14.7 -19.3 -34.0 -3.7 -37.2§ -40.9
7 -5.3 -19.7 -25.0 -10.7 -19.4 -30.1 -16.5 -19.6 -36.1
8 -4.9 -20.0 -24.9 -19.9 -19.5 -39.4 0.5 -36.4 -35.9
9 -5.7 -18.3 -24.0 1.0 -40.7 -39.7 3.2 -41.6 -38.4
average -5.3 -29.2 -34.5 -14.2 -27.4 -41.5 -3.6 -36.8 -40.4
(15%) (85%) (100%) (34%) (66%) (100%) (9%) (91%) (100%)

weakly polar interaction energy

includes the energy of a Pb1-Pb2 H-bond calculated by the rotation method (Supplementary material, Figure 3S).

§

includes the energy of a bifurcated H-bond calculated by a special fragmentation (Supplementary material, Figure 2S).