Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2007 Feb 21;18(4):662–671. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.01.001

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

The percent decline in peak force between pre-fatigue and post-fatigue 60 Hz testing trains (a) and the pre- and post-fatigue 20 Hz:60 Hz peak force ratios (b) for the three fatigue protocols tested. There were significant differences between the pre- and post-fatigue 20 Hz:60 Hz peak force ratios for each of the three fatigue protocols (p < 0.01). *Significant differences between protocols (p ≤ 0.05).