Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Oct 7.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2006 Oct 27;34(1):384–398. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.008

Figure 2.

Figure 2

a) Mean RTs to MI and LI objects and pseudo-objects (Experiment 1); b) Percent signal change (relative to the mean of the corresponding timeseries, see text for details) to the same stimuli, averaged across regions of interest defined by the contrast of MI and LI objects in the main analysis. The dissociation between the RT pattern and the brain activation pattern indicated that RTs alone were not responsible for the object impoverishment effects. Error bars represent the standard error across subjects