Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Oct 7.
Published in final edited form as: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006 Dec 22;353(3):829–834. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.12.111

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The MADLI-MS data collected compare urine proteome of PCa, HGPIN, and BPH patients. A pair-wise comparisons of PCa and BPH subjects (A), as well as HGPIN patients with BPH (B) and PCa (C) patients were plotted to show the sensitivity and specificity as well as the overall probability of correct assignment (combined) based on increasing number of bins used in the analysis. The top 150 bins were chosen using leave one out cross-validation, the graph shows the approximate number of bins necessary to achieve optimal probability of correct assignment. The positive classification rate was determined to indicate correct classification rate (y axis) in relation to the number of bins required to achieve the score (x axis). The number of subjects in each cohort is indicated in parenthesis.