Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Oct 7.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2007 Mar 23;146(2):792–801. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.01.053

Table 1.

Effect of PGE2 on the passive and active membrane properties. Overshoot measured from 0 mV to peak depolarization of the action potential (AP). Afterhyperpolarization (AHP) measured from the resting membrane potential to the maximal membrane hypepolarization. AP duration measured at one-half peak amplitude. The membrane input resistance shows a significant decrease (* P < 0.05, paired t-test) after PGE2 treatment. The apparent increase in the rheobase after PGE2 treatment was not significantly different (P > 0.05, paired t-test) owing to variability in the data set; 6 of the 10 NTS neurons showed no change. CTR denotes control; PGE2 bath applied at 100 nM. Numbers in parenthesis are number of neurons tested.

AP Overshoot (mV) AP AHP (mV) AP duration (ms) AP Threshold (mV) Rheobase (pA) Number AP at 2X Rheobase Rin (MΩ)
CTR 64 ± 3.3 (n = 11) −6 ± 2.2 (n = 11) 1.1 ± 0.1 (n = 11) −25 ± 2 (n = 11) 44 ± 15 (n = 10) 13.3 ± 2.2 (n = 12) 540 ± 46.1 (n = 12)
PGE2 67 ± 4.4 (n = 11) −7 ± 2.1 (n = 11) 1.2 ± 0.1 (n = 11) −27 ± 2 (n = 11) 82 ± 26 (n = 10) 17.9 ± 3.3 (n = 12) 346 ± 46.0* (n = 12)
*

P< 0.05