Table 1.
Cocaine | EC50 (nM) | EMAX (%) |
---|---|---|
0.01 nM [125I]RTI-55 | 290±18 | 101±2 |
0.11 nM [125I]RTI-55 | 439±43* | 102±3 |
1.0 nM [125I]RTI-55 | 985±175*† | 98±6 |
SoRI-2827 | ||
0.01 nM [125I]RTI-55 | 1922±390 | 77±4 |
0.11 nM [125I]RTI-55 | 1765±267 | 75±3 |
1.0 nM [125I]RTI-55 | 3080±1245 | 39±4*† |
SoRI-20040 | ||
0.01 nM [125I]RTI-55 | 1559±247 | 87±3 |
0.11 nM [125I]RTI-55 | 1786±319 | 81±4 |
1.0 nM [125I]RTI-55 | 2969±344*† | 62±2*† |
SoRI-20041 | ||
0.01 nM [125I]RTI-55 | 1377±144 | 69±2 |
0.11 nM [125I]RTI-55 | 1983±270* | 66±2 |
1.0 nM [125I]RTI-55 | 3077±795*† | 44±3*† |
[125I]RTI-55 binding to membranes prepared from hDAT HEK cells was conducted as described in Methods. Ten point inhibition curves were generated for each test drug using three concentrations of [125I]RTI-55. The data were transformed to percent inhibition and fit to the dose-response curve for the best-fit estimates of the EC50 and EMAX, using Kaleidagraph (Version 3.6.4). All curves were an n=4, except for cocaine (n=3). Each value is ±SD.
p<0.05 when compared to the 0.01 nM [125I]RTI-55 condition.
p<0.05 when compared to the 0.11 nM [125I]RTI-55 condition. Students t-test.